Charter Workplace Summit
“Leading at the human edge”
- 01
One week out, the timed agenda is live: "Beyond the Hype: A First Look at the Charter AI Pulse" runs 9:40 to 9:55 with Brian Elliott and Christina Janzer (ex-Slack SVP of Research), and "The Future of the Middle Manager" at 14:00, under the frame "leading at the human edge".
- 02
Elliott previewed the terrain on his own newsletter (12 October): only 11 percent of firms can forecast AI costs within 10 percent, 75 percent of HR professionals made AI-related cuts and 90 percent would reconsider; the full AI Pulse findings, built on surveys of 5,000-plus workers, land on this stage.
- 03
Co-chairs: Betty Larson (CHRO, Merck) and Amy Reichanadter (CPO, Databricks); roughly 30 speakers including Van Jones, Clara Shih, Roy Bahat, David Deming, Annie Duke with Katy Milkman. Virtual attendance is free via Zoom; in-person is paid.
- Elliott, pre-summit: AI overreach is costing more than it returns
The co-presenter of the AI Pulse tips his hand: firms pairing AI with revenue and headcount growth beat the cost-cutters in BCG data, and the Pulse details arrive 21 October.
- Charter publishes full Summit agenda: AI Pulse research debuts on stage
The one-day program (9:00 to 17:30 EST) pairs new proprietary AI-adoption data with sessions on the middle manager and human skills.
For your practice: Register for the free virtual track now and walk in with a position: this radar argues AI productivity arrives with a coordination bill, Gartner just predicted the middle-management cuts get rehired, and the AI Pulse will be the dataset everyone quotes in November.
Charter's fifth annual summit, one day in New York plus virtual access, aimed squarely at executives redesigning how their organizations run — co-chaired by the CHROs of Merck and Databricks, with ~18 named speakers. The published agenda reads like the method's table of contents.
Charter is the sharpest US-elite venue where the “AI flattens the hierarchy → what happens to the middle manager” debate is being had out loud — the exact terrain of “the end of the boss.” The program’s explicit themes (flattening, experimentation cultures, trust, sustainable work) are Semco vocabulary in mainstream dress; treat this as the highest-signal room for language and CHRO relationships, and mine the “future of the middle manager” session for direct positioning.
The live tensions on stage — the questions worth walking in with a view on.
Recent papers from the Research Radar (top universities, last weeks) — evidence to carry into the room.
A paradox of brokerage: alter distrust, network self-promotion, and the willingness to accept referrals from brokers
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes — University College London, Bocconi University
Brokers positioned across structural holes are well placed to refer disconnected people to each other, yet those same networks undermine the trust recipients need before accepting a referral; network self-promotion partly resolves the paradox, substituting for reputational cues where shared contacts cannot supply them. Evidence spans a field study and two experiments. For consultants: a broad network can itself breed distrust, so advertise your matchmaking competence deliberately when brokering introductions between organizations.
Performance Manipulation as a Reaction to the Prevalence of Gossip: The Role of the Self‐Monitoring Trait
Contemporary Accounting Research — KU Leuven, École Supérieure des Sciences Économiques et Commerciales
Gossip is usually cast as informal discipline that deters misconduct, but two field surveys and an experiment find a second channel running the other way: where gossip about peers' performance is prevalent, employees fear negative social evaluation and inflate their reported performance to protect their social image. The effect is weaker for high self-monitors, who manage impressions through other means. For consultants: a gossip-heavy culture can quietly corrupt the performance data itself, which matters for any client running self-reported metrics or peer-visible dashboards.
Cultural conformity reverses the effectiveness of trust-based management: an Ising-inspired model of the Care-Dare dilemma
Frontiers in Physics — The University of Tokyo
Whether investing in trust before demanding performance beats static management policies depends on culture: in an agent-based model of the Care-Dare dilemma, cultural conformity can reverse the effectiveness of trust-based management. Agents update their behavior from the care and dare actions they receive, since people observe behavior but not latent dispositions. For consultants: trust-first strategies are not universal, and in highly conformist cultures the sequencing of care and challenge deserves explicit testing.
Shows from our directory that live on this event's themes — with weekly episode briefs.
Prep from the archive — articles on the themes this event lives in.
AI Is Coming for Your Org Chart, Not Just Your Jobs
AI is set to reshape headcount and management structure at least as much as individual roles. The firms that win will pair targete…
AI Is Eating Entry-Level Work. Rebuild the On-Ramps
AI is hollowing out the first rung of the career ladder, and the damage is landing on early-career workers. Firms that want a futu…
AI Is Eating the First Rung of the Ladder. Redesign Work to Learn
AI is hollowing out entry-level work where people learn the basics. Firms that deliberately re-bundle workflows so juniors still p…
AI Is Erasing Entry-Level Work. Build a New On-Ramp
AI is hollowing out the first rung of the career ladder, where novices used to learn by doing. Firms that do not redesign work and…
